From: Brodbeck, Kelly 
To: Jones, Karen E. 
cc:  
Subject: FW: consultant agreement 

Karen -

We have two consultants for the boat project, John White and Jan McFarland.  Jan has sent her std agreement that contains the contact info for her.  John White is as follows:

John White
V. John White & Associates
1100 11th Street, Suite 311
Sacramento CA  95814

Is it OK to leave the $/hour blank and let them propose a number?

The agreement should be set up such that the scope of work is defined by tasks.  We will ammend the scope of work with new tasks as needed in the future.  Right now the only task is to facilitate the relationship between Enron and various private and governmental organizations (defined by Enron) regarding Enron's confidential marine vessel repowering programs in California (let's leave it this broad).

I'm out Wed thru Fri next week but you can FAX to my hotel when a draft is ready.  OK?

- Kelly

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jan McFarland" <jmcfarland@worldnet.att.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jan+20McFarland+22+20+3Cjmcfarland+40worldnet+2Eatt+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:02 PM
To:	Brodbeck, Kelly
Subject:	consultant agreement

Kelly-

It was nice to meet you.  I think John and I can help you with some
strategic advice on the local enviro NIMBY scene.  Would also be happy to
work on your MERC package and rulemaking.  I am glad Enron is going after
those ferries.

On the school bus idea, I do not have anything at the moment that is not
confidential from Otay.  I will check around and see what is on the public
record and let you know.

A draft consultant agreement is attached for your perusal.  Let me know how
you want to proceed.  Regards! j-

 - CONSULTANT AGREEMENT.doc